تحليل الفجوة بين متطلبات منهج العلوم الابتدائي وبرامج المعهد الوطني للتطوير المهني التعليمي بالمملكة العربية السعودية

1. AGBI. (2023, September). Inside Saudi Arabia’s plans to raise the bar on education [News article]. Arabian Gulf Business Insight. https://www.agbi.com/analysis/employment/2023/09/inside-saudi-arabias-plans-to-raise-the-bar-on-education/

2. Alharbi, M. S., & Albidewi, I. A. (2024). Initial teacher preparation program in Saudi Arabia: History and framework for transformation toward a new era. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1442528. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1442528

3. Almazroa, H., & Al-Shamrani, S. (2015). Saudi science teacher professional development. In N. Mansour & S. Al-Shamrani (Eds.), Science education in the Arab Gulf states (pp. 3–21). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-049-9_1

4. Alshamrani, S., Aldahmash, A., Alqudah, B., & Alroshood, J. (2012). The current situation for science teacher professional development in Saudi Arabia. The Letter of Arabic Gulf, 126, 215–261. https://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/sites/default/files/wq_lttwr_lmhny_lmlmy_llwm_fy_lmmlk_lrby_lswdy.pdf

5. Anthropic. (2026). Claude Opus 4.8 [Large language model]. https://www.anthropic.com

6. Blasi, D. E., Anastasopoulos, A., & Neubig, G. (2022). Systematic inequalities in language technology performance across the world’s languages. In S. Muresan, P. Nakov, & A. Villavicencio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 5486–5505). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.376

7. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

8. Carlson, J., Daehler, K. R., Alonzo, A. C., Barendsen, E., Berry, A., Borowski, A., … Wilson, C. D. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp. 77–92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_2

9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

10. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

11. Fernandez, C. (2005). Lesson study: A means for elementary teachers to develop the knowledge of mathematics needed for reform-minded teaching? Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(4), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0704_1

12. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915

13. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

14. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

15. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: A theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9102-7

16. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.

17. Lucy, L., Demszky, D., Bromley, P., & Jurafsky, D. (2020). Content analysis of textbooks via natural language processing: Findings on gender, race, and ethnicity in Texas U.S. history textbooks. AERA Open, 6(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420940312

18. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4

19. Mansour, N., Alshamrani, S., Aldahmash, A., & Alqudah, B. (2013). Saudi Arabian science teachers and supervisors’ views of professional development needs. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 51, 1–27.

20. Microsoft Corporation. (2023). Power BI [Software]. https://powerbi.microsoft.com

21. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

22. NIEPD. (2024). Workshop on institute strategy and roles in education system. National Institute for Educational Professional Development. https://niepd.gov.sa/en/news/workshop-on-institute-strategy-and-roles-in-education-system

23. Rashtian, H., Hashemi, A., & Macfadyen, L. (2020). Harnessing natural language processing to support curriculum analysis. In Proceedings of ICERI2020 Conference (pp. 1779–1784). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2020.0445

24. Schmidt, W. H., & Prawat, R. S. (2006). Curriculum coherence and national control of education: Issue or non-issue? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(6), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270600682804

25. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

26. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

27. Tai, R. H., Bentley, L. R., Xia, X., Sitt, J. M., Fankhauser, S. C., Chicas-Mosier, A. M., & Monteith, B. G. (2024). An examination of the use of large language models to aid analysis of textual data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241231168

28. Xiao, Z., Yuan, X., Liao, Q. V., Abdelghani, R., & Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2023). Supporting qualitative analysis with large language models: Combining a codebook with GPT-3 for deductive coding. In Companion Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 75–78). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3581754.3584136

29. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0