Using Online Teaching Methods and Smart Learning Techniques to encourage Undergraduates to Study Sciences at Bethlehem University

  • Nader Abu Saad Bethlehem University, Bethlehem, Palestine
  • Ahmad Atiyha Bethlehem University, Bethlehem, Palestine
الكلمات المفتاحية: Smart Learning, Online Teaching Techniques, Smart Devices, Bethlehem University


The main goal of the current study is to explore how well online teaching and smart learning strategies worked to encourage students to pursue scientific courses at Bethlehem University. The study's sample consisted of 55 male and female from the faculty of Science at Bethlehem University. The questionnaire was administered by the researchers using a quantitative research methodology. The findings reveal a statistically significant correlation between the degree of learning advantage from using software and technology and students' ideas for changing the teaching and learning process. Nevertheless, there is not enough information to correlate performance before COVID-19 with students' overall online learning experience. There is also no correlation between students' expectations of the educational benefit of utilizing technology and software and their desired passion for learning the sciences.


1. Alneyadi, S., Wardat, Y., Alshannag, Q., & Abu-Al-Aish, A. (2023). The effect of using smart e-learning app on the academic achievement of eighth-grade students.
2. Azzi-Huck, K., & Shmis, T. (2020). Managing the impact of COVID-19 on education systems around the world: How countries are preparing, coping, and planning for recovery. World Bank Blogs, 18.
3. Bulić, M., & Blažević, I. (2020). The impact of online learning on student motivation in science and biology classes. Journal of Elementary Education, 13(1), 73-87.
4. Cheung, S. K., & Wang, F. L. (2021). The continuous pursuit of smart learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 1-6.
5. Dneprovskaya, N. V., Komleva, N. V., & Urintsov, A. I. (2020). The knowledge management approach to digitalization of smart education. In Advances in Artificial Systems for Medicine and Education II 2 (pp. 641-650). Springer International Publishing.‏
6. Gambo, Y., & Shakir, M. Z. (2022). Evaluating students’ experiences in self-regulated- smart learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 1-34.‏
7. Kholifah, N., Sudira, P., Rachmadtullah, R., Nurtanto, M., & Suyitno, S. (2020). The effectiveness of using blended learning models against vocational education student learning motivation. International Journal, 9(5), 7964-7968.‏
8. Khozaei, S. A., Zare, N. V., Moneghi, H. K., Sadeghi, T., & Taraghdar, M. M. (2022). Effects of quantum-learning and conventional teaching methods on learning achievement, motivation to learn, and retention among nursing students during critical care nursing education. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 18.
9. Lin, M. H., & Chen, H. G. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553-3564.‏
10. Nambiar, D. (2020). The impact of online learning during COVID-19: students’ and teachers’ perspective. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(2), 783-793.‏
11. Nguyen, L. T., Kanjug, I., Lowatcharin, G., Manakul, T., Poonpon, K., Sarakorn, W., & Tuamsuk, K. (2022). How teachers manage their classroom in the digital learning environment–experiences from the University Smart Learning Project. Heliyon, 8(10), e10817.‏
12. Pérez-Escoda, A., Lena-Acebo, F. J., & García-Ruiz, R. (2021). Digital Competences for Smart Learning during COVID-19 in Higher Education Students from Spain and Latin America. Digital Education Review, 40, 122-140.‏
13. Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2022). Addressing student motivation and learning experiences when taking teaching online. Theory into Practice, 61(1), 129-139.
14. Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A. Y., Hussain, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Quality & quantity, 55(3), 805-826.
15. Shereen, M. A., Khan, S., Kazmi, A., Bashir, N., & Siddique, R. (2020). COVID-19 infection: Emergence, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. Journal of advanced research, 24, 91-98.‏
16. Syahmani, S., & Supardi, Z. I. (2020). Effectiveness of i-SMART learning model using chemistry problems solving in Senior High School to improve metacognitive skills and students’ conceptual understanding. Pedagogika, 138(2), 37-60.
17. Wang, P., Ma, T., Liu, L. B., Shang, C., An, P., & Xue, Y. X. (2021). A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Online Instructional Strategies Optimized With Smart Interactive Tools Versus Traditional Teaching for Postgraduate Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 6154.‏
18. Zhu, Z. T., Yu, M. H., & Riezebos, P. (2016). A research framework of smart education. Smart learning environments, 3(1), 1-17.
كيفية الاقتباس
Nader Abu Saad, & Ahmad Atiyha. (2023). Using Online Teaching Methods and Smart Learning Techniques to encourage Undergraduates to Study Sciences at Bethlehem University. مجلة الفنون والأدب وعلوم الإنسانيات والاجتماع, (95), 312-322.